Why the Chiefs should have won against the Patriots… and why they didn’t
I just thought I would make a nice little list on why the Chiefs should have won against the Patriots and why they didn’t. I won’t explain these very much, but I don’t really feel like they need to be explained, they pretty much speak for themselves.
Why the Chiefs should have won against the Patriots:
- The Chiefs won the turnover battle 2 to 1.
- The Chiefs won the Time of Possession battle.
- Tom Brady was injured early in the game and the Pats had to rely on Matt Cassel.
- Matt Cassel is a backup at NE and was a backup in college at USC.
Why the Chiefs didn’t win:
- Dwayne Bowe had way too many drops, at least 4, including the possible game tying TD catch
- Croyle was injured (although I am not totally convinced Croyle would have led us to a TD drive like Huard did). So this one is more based on the theory that our starting QB went out.
- Inability to convert TO’s into points. When you force a team that only lost 6 fumbles all of last season into 2 early fumbles you need to convert them to points
- LJ had less than 100 yards rushing. I’m not sure exactly on the stat but I know that in games where LJ gets to the century mark the Chiefs tend to have a lot more success.
Do you agree with all of these? Do you have any that you would add or take away?
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Comments
Tell me what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!
-
KC Chiefs Football on Facebook
-
